From Primordial Patterns to Selfhood: The Journey of Life’s Complexities

                H.Asif 7.29.24 To truly grasp the nascent formation of selfhood, we must venture into the non-organic realm and explore its dynamics. Here, certain materials, in their various forms, exhibit specific and patterned behaviors that create stable systems. Examples abound in our natural surroundings, requiring no abstraction to understand these occurrences. Patterns in nature, purely inorganic and rooted in the material dynamics of matter, are ubiquitous. Consider the homeostatic balancing of sugar dissolved in liquid, which naturally moves from areas of higher concentration to lower concentration until equilibrium is achieved. Or observe the flow of water through an opening in a tub, forming a whirl that accelerates water molecules around the rim. Crystal and snowflake formations, with their highly patterned angles and perfect symmetry, also illustrate spontaneous emergence of predictable shapes. However, we cannot attribute agency to these processes. When examining more complex systems, nature produces entities that maintain themselves through self-sustenance and self-regeneration—autopoietic processes. Such systems give rise to self-sustaining, self-reproducing entities that continuously regenerate and maintain themselves through their own processes and interactions with the environment. Biologists Humberto Maturana and Francisco Varela originally developed the concept of autopoiesis to describe the self-maintaining chemistry of living cells. A coral reef ecosystem exemplifies an autopoietic system through its ability to maintain a distinct boundary, regulate internal processes, and continuously exchange energy and matter with its environment. The synergy of living and non-living components within the reef sustains and regenerates the ecosystem, bridging the gap between living cells and rudimentary autopoietic systems. Entities such as viruses, prions, viroids, bacteriophages, and protocells dwell in the twilight zone between living and non-living. They exhibit characteristics of living organisms, like replication and environmental responsiveness, yet lack others, such as autonomous metabolism and cellular structure. While they do not fully meet the criteria for autopoiesis, they illuminate the nuanced continuum between life and non-life. The crux of my argument is that life processes and their early emergence hinge on the formation of a self-sustaining entity that creates a boundary between itself and its environment. To be alive, an entity must achieve a status of selfhood, demarcated from its environment. While it may depend on the environment for sustenance, it must possess the capacity to regenerate its internal processes and constituents. From this perspective, life and self are synonymous. Life is a process that bestows matter with a separate and independently viable identity. For this process to take shape and sustain itself, it must be underpinned by patterns fashioned by the natural dynamics of matter in its various forms, bound together continuously by electromagnetic forces. Was this process merely a manifestation of material dynamics, or was it an electromagnetic pattern that co-opted matter, initiating a self-sustaining electron chain? This is a question worth exploring. Is life an imprint of an electromagnetic field etched onto matter, using and adapting it to express increasingly complex forms? Once a self-sustaining molecular system composed of rudimentary molecules emerged, it embarked on a journey of increasing complexity. This increase in complexity, coupled with efficient entropy reduction, acts as a template, scaling from unicellular to multicellular levels, ultimately forming the sophisticated tapestry of life we observe today. . two primary objectives can be identified : one is the creation of efficiency in reducing entropy, and the second is to accumulate more energy, thereby increasing the overall energy flow in the system. This progression leads unicellular organisms to evolve into multicellular organisms, which continue to advance in complexity while enhancing their efficiency in reducing entropy. A crucial point here which we need to start understanding and making sense is that of agency and sense of self separate from non self;: the concept of agency and selfhood originates right at the onset of life processes. With the formation of the first self-sustaining electron chain, a rudimentary and primordial form of agency and selfhood emerges because the matter begins to interact with its environment in an informed manner. This interaction implies a level of autonomy and purpose inherent in the very basics of life. This selfhood evolves in parallel with the increasing complexity of the organization of matter, all the while adhering to the two primary objectives of reducing entropy and enhancing energy flow. This evolution progresses through various stages of life—from plants to animals, and within animals, from simpler forms to more complex ones like mammals, primates, and eventually humans. Each step represents a refinement and intensification of selfhood, alongside a more sophisticated mechanism for managing entropy. This continuous chain marks a trajectory of ever-increasing complexity and coherence in selfhood. The  primary purpose of this ongoing process of differentiation and complexity is to enhance efficiency and increase overall complexity, aligning with the objectives of managing entropy and energy flow more effectively. This continuous progression not only pertains to physical and biological complexity but also influences the evolutionary trajectory of consciousness and self-awareness. Multiscalar intelligence  Each evolutionary step from unicellular organisms to more complex multicellular forms displays a level of intelligence that correlates with their level of selfhood. This intelligence manifests as various strategies to address environmental challenges, indicating an adaptive, problem-solving capability that scales up through biological complexity. This “multiscalar intelligence” evolves continuously, becoming more sophisticated up through primates and culminating in the human brain, – not an endpoint but as an advanced extension of this process, where intelligence and selfhood are highly developed. This perspective ties the progression of life forms to the evolution of intelligence and consciousness. Here we might like to look into the progression of life form none other than  our own origin from a single Egg to the development of the human embryo from zygote to a fully formed human with complex psychological and cognitive capacities is indeed a microcosm of the broader evolutionary journey from unicellular to multicellular life forms. This embryonic development process, known as ontogeny, mirrors the phylogenetic evolution of species in many ways. Starting from the zygote, a single cell resulting from the fusion of sperm and egg, we see the initial phase of life where all genetic information necessary for a new individual is contained in a compact form. As the zygote divides and grows, it forms a blastocyst and then an embryo, gradually differentiating into more specialized cells and structures. This mirrors how, over evolutionary time, life diversified from simple forms into more complex organisms. As the embryo develops, various organs and systems begin to form, and this stage is akin to the development of new biological capabilities in early multicellular organisms. By the time the embryo becomes a fetus, it has developed most major organ systems, though they continue to mature. After birth, the human infant resembles earlier stages of mammalian evolution with basic reflexes and instincts. However, as the child grows, the brain’s development accelerates, encompassing higher cognitive functions, social behaviors, and problem-solving skills, reflecting the evolutionary progression toward advanced intelligence and social organization seen in primates, especially humans. This rapid progression of human cognitive development from infancy through childhood and into adolescence mirrors the accelerated pace of human cultural and technological evolution, showcasing how biological, psychological, and sociocultural evolution are intertwined. Exploring this parallel helps highlight the integrative process of development and evolution, offering insights into how complex traits like intelligence, consciousness, and selfhood have evolved over millions of years. It’s a profound illustration of life’s continuity and complexity, all encapsulated in a single human lifespan.  we consider that selfhood and agency are present from the earliest stages of life, even at the unicellular level, it’s intriguing to think about these qualities existing in a zygote. This early form of selfhood is inherently biological and tied to the very mechanisms of life and survival, and as the zygote develops into a fetus and eventually is born as a newborn, this rudimentary selfhood is carried through each stage. As the fetus develops, its neurophysiological structures begin to form and differentiate. This foundational neurological architecture will support all future cognitive, emotional, and sensory processing. The brain of a newborn, though not fully developed, already has the primary systems necessary for basic perception and interaction with its environment, which are crucial for the initial experiences of agency and selfhood. These experiences are shaped by interactions with the world; a newborn quickly starts to learn from environmental stimuli. The responses it elicits from its caregivers, for example, begin to reinforce its sense of self and other, laying the groundwork for more complex forms of self-awareness. This primary neurophysiological structure supports the baby’s basic needs and interactions but will continue to grow and become more complex, mirroring the cognitive and psychological development we see in the progression from a newborn to a child. This development is not just about growing more neurons or synapses but also about how these structures are used—how experiences shape the brain’s pathways, reinforcing some connections while letting others lapse. This dynamic process reflects the evolving nature of selfhood, shaped continuously by both internal biological factors and external social interactions. Primordial self The concept of the “primordial self” is rooted in the very foundations of our earliest existence, carrying forward the essence of selfhood from the embryonic stage. This primordial self is underpinned by two core components: interception, which relates to the internally felt experiences, and exteroception, which involves the processing of external sensory stimuli. Together, these form the basic structure of the primordial self. The interoceptive aspect captures the internal state of the body—these are the sensations like hunger, pain, and comfort that a child feels from the very beginning. This internal awareness is crucial as it informs the organism about its basic needs and well-being, which is fundamental for survival. Exteroception, on the other hand, involves the development of sensory perceptions through which the child begins to interact with and understand the world around them. This includes sight, sound, touch, and other sensory modalities. As these sensory systems develop, they provide the child with crucial information about their environment, facilitating learning and adaptation. While the primordial self comprises these basic sensory and interoceptive experiences, it does so without the higher-level conscious awareness we associate with mature cognition. This means that while a newborn interacts with and responds to its environment, the awareness it has is not reflective or constructed with a narrative, as seen in older children and adults. This foundational stage sets the groundwork for the development of more complex forms of self-awareness and consciousness as the child grows. The interactions between their internal states and the external world gradually contribute to a richer, more integrated sense of self, paving the way for the emergence of higher consciousness and self-reflective capabilities. There is a  compelling connection between the neurophysiological structures, specifically at the brainstem level involving systems like the superior colliculi , periaqueductal gray(PAG) and cochlear systems, and their role in maintaining the spatial and temporal orientation of the primordial self and suffusing it with emotion.. This foundational level supports not just physical balance but also contributes to a rudimentary sense of self that is oriented in space and time, providing a basic, felt experience of existence. Moving into the emotional aspects, emotions likely evolve as mechanisms to maintain homeostatic balance. In this framework, primary emotions are responses to disturbances in the interoceptive field. These disturbances signal deviations from physiological equilibrium, prompting emotional responses that serve to restore balance. This conceptualization aligns well with theories that view emotions fundamentally as biological mechanisms for regulating life processes. Jaak Panksepp’s work on core emotional systems provides a profound insight into this topic. He identified several distinct emotional systems in the brain—such as SEEKING, FEAR, RAGE, LUST, CARE, PANIC/GRIEF, and PLAY—that are thought to be neurologically and functionally distinct, yet universally present across mammalian species. Each of these systems serves specific adaptive functions and is tied to fundamental biological needs. Panksepp’s model suggests that these core emotional systems are deeply rooted in the brain’s architecture, arising from the primordial self. These emotions are not just reactive but are predictive, guiding behavior in ways that enhance survival and reproductive success. For instance, the SEEKING system drives the organism to explore and acquire resources, while the FEAR system helps avoid dangers. Merging the instinctual systems identified by Panksepp with the concept of the growing primordial self offers a fascinating perspective on the development of consciousness and personality. As this primordial self matures, it’s not only shaped by its initial sensory and interoceptive inputs but also deeply influenced by these instinctual systems, which provide a structured response framework to environmental stimuli and intThe interaction between the primordial self and these instinctual packages could be envisioned as a dynamic process where each instinct contributes to the shaping and refining of selfhood. For example:

1. The SEEKING system could drive the exploratory behaviors and curiosity that lead to learning and cognitive development, thus expanding the self’s understanding of the world.
2. The FEAR and RAGE systems might define boundaries and protective measures, influencing how the self interacts with threats and stressors, potentially shaping personality traits related to resilience and aggression.
3. The LUST and CARE systems are crucial for the development of social bonds and reproductive behaviors, which could integrate into the self’s social identity and affiliative behaviors.
4. The PANIC/GRIEF system might be fundamental in developing the capacity for deep emotional connections and empathy, as responses to loss and separation could enhance the social and emotional aspects of the self.
5. The PLAY system likely plays a critical role in social learning and the development of social cognition, impacting how the self learns to navigate complex social environments.

By welding these systems into the evolving primordial self, we can see a model where each system not only responds to immediate physiological needs or threats but also contributes to the longitudinal development of a complex, socially and environmentally responsive self. This model suggests a layered, integrative development where the primal biological and emotional responses are foundational to the later, more complex layers of personality, cognition, and conscious awareness.ernal states.  the dynamic and multifaceted nature of the self as it develops through a combination of instinctual drives and the foundational primordial experiences. By Understanding that   the secondary self—or emotional self—is shaped by a unique blend of these instinctual systems, one can see  how deeply personalized and varied human experience and behavior can be. This conceptual framework allows for a spectrum of selves within each individual, influenced by their specific environmental interactions and genetic predispositions. This variability in how instincts combine to form the secondary self explains why individuals respond so differently to similar situations. For instance, one person might respond to a challenge with enthusiasm and curiosity, driven by a dominant SEEKING system, while another might react with caution or avoidance, influenced more heavily by the FEAR system. This leads to a rich diversity in personality types and coping mechanisms, reflecting the unique configuration of instincts that shape each person’s secondary self. The point centered around human beings not having a singular, unchanging ‘self’ but rather a collection of selves that vary according to context and internal dynamics challenges more traditional views of a consistent, unified identity and opens up more nuanced discussions about the complexity of human psychology and identity. This point of view  could have significant implications for psychological and therapeutic practices, suggesting that interventions could be more tailored to an individual’s specific instinctual profile and emotional self-configuration. It also invites a broader discussion on the fluidity and adaptability of the self, potentially leading to a deeper understanding of mental health and human behavior. Secondary self and Default mode network Diving deeper into the neurological substrates of the secondary self is a crucial step in understanding the complex interplay between biological structures and the emergence of selfhood.  As we go up tracing the development of primary to secondary level of self hood a model appears where the interoceptive system, along with neural activities in the brainstem, hypothalamus, and particularly the periaqueductal gray, lay the foundational neurobiological basis for what becomes the secondary or emotional self. These areas are pivotal for their roles in autonomic control and emotional processing, linking bodily states with emotional experiences. The brainstem and hypothalamus are involved in basic life functions and instinctual responses, while the periaqueductal gray is key in mediating responses to threats, pain, and stress, which are fundamental to the emotional aspects of selfhood. The role of the default mode network (DMN) adds another layer of complexity. The DMN is a network of brain regions that is typically active when the mind is at rest and not focused on the outside world, often involved in self-referential thoughts and the consolidation of the self across past, present, and future narratives. The DMN includes midline structures like the medial prefrontal cortex and the posterior cingulate cortex, which are crucial for integrating personal history, self-awareness, and social evaluations. By linking the primal neurophysiological activities of the brainstem, hypothalamus, and periaqueductal gray with the higher-order cortical activities of the DMN, I suggests a multi-tiered architecture where the primary self, governed by basic physiological and emotional processes, feeds into a more complex network that supports the narrative and reflective capacities of the secondary self. This bi-level integration—where fundamental emotional and physiological processing informs and shapes the reflective and narrative understanding of selfhood—highlights how our moment-to-moment feelings and long-term self-concept are deeply intertwined with our brain’s structure and function. Exploring how these layers interact and influence each other could provide profound insights into everything from individual differences in personality and behavior to vulnerabilities to mental health conditions. Emergence of Narrative Self As we move further  up incorporating further biological structures in the forebrain we mix the present and the past –sensory data from inside and outside in the present moment and stitch it appropriately to the past memories – memories guide the present moment by providing a reference from the past  thus forming a third layer of experience  The  progression to the third layer of evolving selfhood incorporates a richer, more integrated perspective that encompasses memory, personal narrative, and the more refined aspects of self-consciousness. The Default Mode Network (DMN) is instrumental in this layer as it not only maintains self-referential thoughts but also integrates memories and experiences from past interactions with the environment. This integration forms a complex, narrative self that transcends moment-to-moment experiences and emotional responses. The emergence of the narrative self at this third layer is crucial. This aspect of selfhood is shaped by the stories we tell ourselves about who we are, our past experiences, and our anticipated future. The narrative self synthesizes information across time and social contexts, constructing a coherent identity that includes personal goals, values, and beliefs about oneself. This is where the DMN plays a pivotal role, as it is highly active during tasks involving self-referential thinking and when people reflect on their personal experiences, consider their own mental states, or think about others’ perspectives. Moreover, the interaction between the DMN and other neural networks like the salience network and executive control network facilitates the shift from internal modes of thinking to focused, task-oriented activities. This dynamic interplay allows for the flexible application of self-knowledge and emotional insights to varying social and environmental demands, reinforcing the narrative self in diverse contexts. The narrative self thus represents a synthesis of our autobiographical memories, integrated with our emotional and instinctual selves, shaped by our interactions and the meanings we ascribe to them. This layer of selfhood provides continuity and personal identity across the lifespan, offering a robust sense of who we are as individuals. the apex of human cognitive and emotional development. This self-reflective consciousness, facilitated by the integration of the DMN with the salience and executive networks, allows for an advanced form of self-awareness that is characteristic of human beings. This synthesis enables individuals to not only maintain a continuous sense of self through the narrative construction of past experiences and future projections but also to evaluate and adjust these narratives in real-time based on new information and situational demands. The role of the frontal lobes is crucial in this context as they are key to planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. They enable us to think about long-term consequences, manage emotions in complex social situations, and perform abstract thinking and reasoning. All these capabilities are essential for the type of self-reflection that defines the narrative self. This final level of self-reflective consciousness is not just about understanding oneself as a separate entity in the world but also involves a sophisticated ability to introspect and question one’s thoughts, feelings, and motivations. It allows individuals to step back and think about their thinking, known as metacognition, which is fundamental to self-improvement, moral reasoning, and deep empathy. Thus, this model of selfhood —ranging from the primordial self that handles basic biological and emotional needs, through the secondary selves that are shaped by instinctual drives, to the narrative self that constructs a coherent personal identity—provides a comprehensive framework for understanding the layers of consciousness that culminate in the sophisticated human capacity for self-reflection and self-awareness.

References:

1. Becker, R. O., & Selden, G. (1985). The Body Electric: Electromagnetism and the Foundation of Life. Harper.
2. Ho, M. W. (1998). The Rainbow and the Worm: The Physics of Organisms. World Scientific.
3. Deamer, D. W. (1997). The First Living Systems: A Bioenergetic Perspective. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 61(2), 239-261.
4. Russell, M. J., & Kanik, I. (2010). Why does life start, what does it do, where is it going? Journal of Cosmology, 5, 1008-1039.
5. Schrödinger, E. (1944). What is Life? The Physical Aspect of the Living Cell. Cambridge University Press.
6. Chaisson, E. J. (2001). Cosmic Evolution: The Rise of Complexity in Nature. Harvard University Press.
7. Morowitz, H. J. (1968). Energy Flow in Biology: Biological Organization as a Problem in Thermal Physics. Academic Press.
8. Lane, N. (2009). Life Ascending: The Ten Great Inventions of Evolution. W. W. Norton & Company.
9. Deacon, T. W. (2012). Incomplete Nature: How Mind Emerged from Matter. W. W. Norton & Company.
10. Kauffman, S. A. (1993). The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution. Oxford University Press.
11. Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. D. Reidel Publishing Company.
12. Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind. Harvard University Press.
13. Sagan, D. (2011). Cosmic Apprentice: Dispatches from the Edges of Science. University of Minnesota Press.
14. Margulis, L. (1998). Symbiotic Planet: A New Look at Evolution. Basic Books.
15. Dawkins, R. (2006). The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press.
16. Bonner, J. T. (1988). The Evolution of Complexity by Means of Natural Selection. Princeton University Press.
17. Gould, S. J. (1977). Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Harvard University Press.
18. Carroll, S. B. (2005). Endless Forms Most Beautiful: The New Science of Evo Devo. W. W. Norton & Company.
19. Gazzaniga, M. S. (2008). Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind. W. W. Norton & Company.
20. Kuhl, P. K. (2004). Early language acquisition: Cracking the speech code. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(11), 831-843.
21. Damasio, A. (2010). Self Comes to Mind: Constructing the Conscious Brain. Pantheon.
22. Seth, A. K. (2013). Interoceptive inference, emotion, and the embodied self. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(11), 565-573.
23. Craig, A. D. (2002).